S’wonderful S’marvelous

In the comedic world, we are graced with funny faces who are clear tributes towards their craft.

But what happens when these leaders begin to branch their way out of their respective worlds? Is the key to sitcom success the ability to maneuver your way through different aspects of society, while addressing all present issues in a non-evasive manner? As comedy juggernaut Mindy Kaling has said, “The key to creating something successful, especially in regards to a show, is to stay relevant.”

Mindy Kaling has ventured into a multi spectra of worlds through various social media platforms and simply a keen interest in everything that could be laughed at. This autumn, she was honored at the 2014 Glamour Woman of the Year Awards, presented by satirical sachem Stephen Colbert.

Kaling’s recognition of accolades in the fashion world is credited to her work ethic in the television world just as Stephen Colbert has bridged the gap between satirical comedy and addressing hard-hitting news. Take a look and see for yourself as to why it is vital for successful sitcoms to have well-rounded faces like Mindy and Stephen representing them.

Whose Wikipedia is it anyway?

Many things come to mind when thinking of Wikipedia.

Some consider it a holy grail of all knowing knowledge while others define it as the stomping grounds of non-educated internet aficionados. While the credibility for many pages may be questionable, it is fair to say that Wikipedia is a relevant source of information gather which plays a integral part of everyday life. There is nothing that Wiki doesn’t cover. Seriously, it’s weird. Each and every facet of life is categorized then sub-categorized into one big helping of generalized information: including sitcoms.

The lineage of comedy is humungo in the Wiki world, settling its roots with the history of theatrical comedy then branching off to more modern practices including stand-up, roasts, film, and especially situational comedic television.

Want to know how sitcoms got their start in North America? There’s a page for that. How about a list of every episode of “Parks and Rec”? There’s a page for that too. Or maybe you were just extremely curious about the name of Nick Offerman’s childhood pet iguana? You can find it all.

But how reliable is this information? Conceptionally, Wiki is an innovative platform in which we the users have the opportunity to make available exactly what it is that we wish to learn more about. The freedom lies beneath our fingertips to type in a subject and create a page dedicated to it. But despite the lures and expansive repertoire of Wiki, it just doesn’t make the cut when it comes to quality control.

02ae8ded58bf3e1c8e916ec420fffb81fd4311f30c9bde296ee1a14793c85f36

After spending a few days editing basic branch pages of sitcoms, I’ve learned a few things about what it takes to be a successful Wiki page. It can be tough. Citations are constantly evolving due to pages being taken down. Credibility of sources can be hard to deem credible due to large chunk of information being sourced from popular bloggers of that topic. For Wikipedia, consistency is key. An evident pattern in the problems of the site is that smaller branch pages are more detailed and clearly sourced than larger ones, for example, the Modern Family Wiki page is much more carefully curated than the root Wiki page for sitcoms. Some pages have more supervision than others, making it harder to edit but also ensuring the quality of the content which is present.

All in all, Wikipedia has major pros and major cons. It is a cool platform to use (if utilized properly) and despite it not being the best source for credible information, it is one which gets the basics of my job done at the end of the day.

ebfb2c914d58c20575683eeaf1b38ff83846cb75eee7b689286bf8cabff196fe

Who runs the world? Feminists.

Throughout the years, women on television sitcoms have been depicted stereotypically in their gender roles. Women were associated with a specific presence in front of an audience, one which left the role of comedian to their male counterparts. However, there has been a surge in modern television shows that exemplify feminism. As defined by Merriam Webster, feminism is the belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities. The classic show “Laverne and Shirley”, for example, is about two young independent woman living together on their own  while working at a Milwaukee brewery. An article, by Nara Rutten, mentions “three types of gender roles for women: the traditional woman, the liberated woman, and the modern woman.” The leads of “Laverne and Shirley”, are representative of a liberated womanhood, which is defined as women who are “freed from or opposed to traditional, social, and sexual attitudes or ways of behaving.” As we’ve grown more accustomed towards female lead presences on our favorite shows, it is our jobs as the viewers to understand the fundamentals behind the revolutionizing of women leading TV, in the most unconventional roles.

We are currently in the third-wave feminism and as society embraces female empowerment and equality in fair representation, we see various media platforms embracing the message as well. This as a result began creating communities of multiple individual acknowledging a cultural shift in our society. Becoming more aware of feminism and its purpose, we are able to conduct feminist TV analysis in order to consider how many television sitcoms portray female equality and embrace feminism.The roles of women on television have drastically changed over time; from “Leave it to Beaver’s”, June Cleaver’s stay-at-home housewife role to “The Cosby Show’s”, Clair Huxtable’s career-orientated role. In Gabrielle Moss’s article,  Sitcoms are the Golden Land of Feminist TV Characters, she exclaims, “Sitcoms are broadening their ideas of what kind of woman a feminist can be, and I think we have more feminists as sitcom protagonists than we ever have before.”

rosie the riveter via flickr creative commons

(rosie the riveter via flickr creative commons)

What exactly does feminism imply? Whether or not the the foundation of its principles lie within fair representation and equality in opportunity, feminism is highlighting a new aspect to consider when it comes to roles in television; particularly situational comedies. While the rise of female lead characters are at an all time high, sitcoms are introducing a medium of power which women are not typically associated with: comedy. With shows such as 30 Rock, New Girl, and The Mindy Project, women are not only the ones in control, but they are the ones who dictate the last laugh. The transitioning into “female-friendly” TV is coming of age only because of the female pioneers who preceded. In an interview with  Roseanne Barr and Mindy Kaling, it is Kaling who credits Burr for making it easier for powerhouses like Tina Fey and Amy Poehler to break into the men’s world of creating comedy. Successful comedic women understand that focusing on the fight for feminism is not big enough to get them as far as they want to go. Essentially a concept of “fake it ‘till you make it,” true success is achieved when you believe that you are the best person for your job in the room. To get over gender, one must look past gender. Roseanne Burr for example, of the classic show “Roseanne” credits her success towards her mission of NOT directly addressing the concept of feminism. Her idea was to create the most accurate depiction of a working class woman and mother as she could, and she very well knew that the only way she could achieve the perfect culmination of her ideas was to produce and star in it it herself.

The idea of feminism and comedy is one which is both intertwined and transcendental. A prime example of transcendentalism in comedy is Clair Huxtable of “The Cosby Show” and the “Huxtable Effect.” Her characterization was one which inspired the likes of many current female sitcom leads to stop whining on their shows about girl power and how women should be treated by their men. Instead, the approach which was adopted was one of more directness: portraying roles of sharp wit which lead to power. Comedy on television is brasher now, leaving nothing unscathed as both male and female leads are truly submerging themselves within their crafts to be the funniest person in the room. Feminism is an issue which is unfortunately still an issue. It is an ideal and concept which should be realized to the fullest without prejudice. But the best way to attain power isn’t to beg an audience for it. As something great comedic women such as Roseanne, Tina, Amy, and Mindy understand: the way to keep feminism alive and relentless is to show no recollection of women being treated unfairly and to carry on slaying in men’s territory.

roseanne/anarchy poster via flickr creative commons

(roseanne/anarchy poster via flickr creative commons)

~This blog has been a joint effort, brought to you by bloggers tahesincerely and jasselyngtz. If you like what you read, leave comments and check out the blogs for more material!